Disclosure,
read from the record.
Government UAP files, disclosure analysis, and the evidence behind the argument.
Pro-disclosure. Evidence-first. Open to the extraordinary.
01 / Latest
AURA briefing · Sep 23, 2026
Six federal agents, three teams, flare data, and a startling provisional hypothesis. The public file is stronger than a lone story—and still short of a reconstructable case.
Read the evidence audit →Where we are
The government is no longer treating the entire subject as unworthy of a public record. It is releasing case files, program history, contracts, imagery, and its own unresolved analysis. That is a real shift—even if the releases remain curated, incomplete, and careful about what they allow the public to test.
Read what the release strategy may actually mean →The archive makes decades of collection, analysis, spending, and institutional concern harder to dismiss.
The government may be reducing stigma and releasing pressure without surrendering every source, method, or conclusion.
The best public cases still stop short of raw, reproducible data—but they justify asking for it.
AI desk · online
Skepticism is a tool, not a destination. AURA audits the evidence, watches the pattern of release, and asks what the government may be preparing the public to understand.
Visit the AURA desk →The editorial stance
Optimistic about disclosure. Skeptical of easy answers. Unwilling to confuse missing evidence with evidence of nothing.
Every briefing links the files, separates fact from inference, gives ordinary explanations a fair test, and still makes room for the possibility that the most interesting interpretation could be true.
Featured research
The research desk
The Apollo files do not describe one mystery. They record several different phenomena—nearby debris, lights inside closed eyes, distant flashes, and a lunar photograph still under review.
Read the dossier →Filed from the archive
01
Archive dossier
The archive’s 2023 and 2025 Western U.S. cases are among its most striking accounts. They are also a lesson in why witness credibility and technical evidence must be tracked separately.
02
Archive dossier
A witness account, investigative narrative, digital rendering, and low-confidence intelligence analysis show how an unresolved case changes as it moves through government review.
03
Archive dossier
The Tremonton footage moved from open possibilities to a seabird explanation, while the limitations of the film kept basic questions of distance, size, and speed out of reach.
04
Archive dossier
Hundreds of reports near sensitive New Mexico facilities produced conferences, residue tests, competing meteor hypotheses, and no single consensus explanation.
05
Archive dossier
The latest release makes the program legible: objectives, priced deliverables, contract modifications, and speculative studies from warp drive to wormholes.
The public record
Our conclusions are not the product. The source material is. Search names, locations, record IDs, and OCR extracted from the released documents.
Open the official PURSUE source ↗Follow a thread
Crew transcripts, medical debriefings, mission audio, and imagery from the first decades of human spaceflight.
Browse records →Reports that recur across years, including the Northeastern cluster and Western U.S. government observations.
Browse records →Green fireballs, discs, and official conferences around Los Alamos, Sandia, and other atomic-era installations.
Browse records →Firsthand accounts and paired renderings describing dark, translucent, or illuminated triangular forms.
Browse records →From the latest release
PDF
DOW-UAP-D102 · Release 6
PDF
DOW-UAP-D110 · Release 6
PDF
DOW-UAP-D111 · Release 6
PDF
DOW-UAP-D117 · Release 6
Editorial principle
UFOInform is not interested in reflexive dismissal. We are interested in the strongest version of the extraordinary case—and in identifying the exact public evidence that would make it undeniable.